Optimization of opeation parameters for methylene blue degradation by UV/TiO2/H2O2 process in an annular reactor
Abstract
In this study, the degradation of methylene blue (MB) by UV/TiO2/ H2O2 process was ivestigated in an annular reactor. The effects of the factors: TiO2 concentration, H2O2 dosage, UV density, and hydrodynamic conditions on the reaction rate constant were evaluated by the response surface methodology. The results showed that TiO2 concentration, H2O2 dosage and UV density had a great influence on the kapp, hydrodynamics had a lower influence. Design Expert V.11 software is used to optimize the reaction conditions, the optimal apparent reaction rate constant is 0.168 min-1 under the following conditions: TiO2 concentration of 0.2 g/l, H2O2 dosage is 0.063 mol/l, UV density of 287 W/m2 and Re number is 10000.Downloads
References
H. Dong, G. Zeng, L. Tang, C. Fan, C.Zhang, X. He, Y. He, Water Res., 79 (2015) 128-146 https:// 10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.038
R. Molinari, C. Lavorato, P. Argurio, Catal. Today, 281 (2017) 144-164 https:// 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.06.047
I. K. Konstantinou, T.A. Albani, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 49 (2004) 1–14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.11.010
S. Mozia, Sep. Purif. Technol., 73 (2010) 71-91 https//: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.03.021
S. Rehman, R. Ullah, A.M. Butt, N.D. Gohar, J. Hazar. Mater., 170 (2009) 560–56 https//: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.064
N.T.T Trang, N.T. Nhiem. T.Q. Vinh, N.K. Hong, L.T.H. Nam, N.M. Tan, J. Exper. Nanosci. 11 (2016) 226-238 https:// doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2015.1053541
J.Q. Wei, X.J. Chen, P.F .Wang Y.B .Han, J.C. Xu, B. Hong, H.X. Jin, D.F. Jin, X.L. Peng, J. Li, Y.T. Yang, H.L. Ge, X.Q. Wan, Chem. Phys.510 (2018) 47-53 https:// 10.1016/j.chemphys.2018.05.012
D. B. Miklos, C. Remy, M. Jekel, K. G. Linden, J. E. Drewes, U. Hübner, Water Res. 139 (2018) 118-131 https:// 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042
N. N. Mahamuni, Y. G. Adewuyi, Ultrasonics Sonochem. 17 (2010) 990–1003 https:// 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.09.005
M. Saquiba, M. Abu Tariqa, M.M. Haquea, M. Munee. J. Environ. Manag.88 (2008) 300–306 https:// 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.012
Q. Zhang, C. Li, T. Li, Chem. Eng. J. 217 (2013) 407–413 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.106
A. Dixit, A.K. Mungra, M. Chakraborty, Inter. J. Chem. Eng. Appl., 1 (2010) 247-250
C. Sahoo, A.K. Gupta. J. Hazar. Mater. 215–216 (2012) 302–310 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.072
M.I. Franch, J.A. Ayllón, J. Peral, X. Domènech,. Catal. Today 76 (2002) 221-233 https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063455X13050019
P.T.H. Quynh, N.T. Thao, T.T.H. Trang, N.T.T. Trang, P.D. Chinh. N.M. Tan. Vietnam J. Catal. Ad., 8-isssue 2 (2019) 81-85
0. Legrini, E. Oliveros, and A. M. Braun. Chem. Rev. 93 (1993) 671-698 https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00018a003
W.H. Chu N. Y. Gao Y. Deng, Clean soil ari water, 37-issue 3 (2009) 233-238 https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.200900002
J.M. Herrmann, M.N. Mozzanega, P. Pichat, P, J. Photochem. 22 (1983) 333-343
J. Kumar, A. Bansal, Heat Mass Transfer. 48 (2012) 2069–2077 https:// 10.1007/s00231-012-1052-4
